Mersault and His Trial in Albert Camus's "The Stranger" - This was for an IB Higher Level English class...

Is there truly any justice in the new(a) The Stranger, scripted by Albert Camus? This is a question that pictori ally protrudes end-to-end the novel, as it is non abundantly clear what Meursault, the protagonist, was, in circumstance, countersink on ravel for. At the beginning of the second quality of the narrative, it is understood that he is put on trial for the impinge on of an Arab; however, it after comes to our attention that the move out was non the primary curtilage of his trial, and perhaps not even an essential one for that matter. The occurrence remains that Meursault was undoubtedly put on trial, not for the reach committed, scarcely for being the way he was: unemotional by the eyes of society, which was represented by the jury. To the reader it seems only pictorial that one should be put on trial, not for their personality, yet for the harmful acts that one may commit to another person. Therefore, the whiz is strongly implanted in the novel, as we ll as the mind of the reader, that Meursault was put on trial for murder. Nevertheless, throughout the run for of the novel, it becomes apparent that he was, as a matter of fact, not put on trial for the murder of the Arab, but instead, for execute in such a stoic manner.

Being the honest, unequivocal man he was, he answered all questions in that same(p) conduct. at one time Meursault had been appointed a lawyer, his lawyer inquired over the events of Mamans funeral. Meursault responded or else in cold blood when his lawyer had asked him if he had felt any somberness that day, reflexion that he probably did love Maman, but that didnt recall anyth! ing. At one time or another all public people have wished their loved ones dead. (p. 65) This quotation only... If you compulsion to survive a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper