The Conqueror Bookworm: How Harsh is too Harsh?

In the article titled ?Conqueror pedant,? published in an essence of American Libraries, author David Majka begins his article by presenting an egression to the readers apply a strong, almost angry t angiotensin converting enzyme. Majka invites the idea that libraries be cosmos threatened due to passel not understanding how to demeanour proper research. Majka also discusses the return of the uncover dealing with the derive of digital sources community atomic number 18 using to find information. In his article, Majka idealizes that people be worthy lazy; in that respectfore, he poses that in that location is a threat facing librarians and their jobs. Towards the end of the article, Majka begins to present a blood to the librarians in order to save their job, such as, transgress merchandising of the importance of the librarians? jobs. He states librarians evolve hold of to work harder to thread people away from digital sources. This article, although suppo sed to be motivating, seemed to be very degrading. There was much ab come off the article that would interference me if I were a librarian to whom he was directing this towards. Majka?s ideas were much likewise general, the musical note was unnecessarily offensive, and I touch his solution does do justice to the ideas he portrays end-to-end the article. In my opinion, Majka?s article is much to general: ??we are doing a rotten job of reinforcing the reality and of defending scholarship, the run aground terra firma for our existence? (63). It is to be stated that in that respect are seemingly a few librarians, though it may not be many, that are onerous to stray away from this caper. It should also be stated that in this article, this idea is not mentioned once. He dialogue to the librarians as if they are just one joint person. ?We result not win by converting one bibliographical guidance class at a time, or by academic session around waiting for the masses t o distinguish to us?? (62). This, to me, i! s give tongue to that all librarians purify the akin(predicate) thing and no one tries to be different. Nothing in this world is one sided. A group of people do not do everything the same; some people try to change it. The tone in which Majka presents his assumptions and ideas is strongly offensive. If I were a librarian reading this article, I would most likely interest offense to it. Majka reiterates the idea that he thinks librarians are, for the lack of a bump phrase, lazy and the cause of this scurvy research epidemic. He at one point states that librarians ?could scantily be doing a worsened job of defending our liberty in the face of this disturb situation? (63). He also, at one point, uses harsh rhetorical questions: ?Why do we take up you? Why Should we march on to support you?? (63). Majka, after putting spile every librarian, presented a solution to this issue. However, I feel it is ailing sight out and was no different than some of the issues that h e discussed earlier in the article.

Majka?s solution is ?tell[ing] the world the peachy news about(predicate) the wealth of resources and assistance that we have to advise in the spiritual rebirth to the Information Age? (63). He believes that librarians ?need to get out and advertise what [they] do and why [their] go are much important than ever, and we need to do it in mass media? (63). To me, that seems to be a very poorly thought out idea. He has all these problems with librarians, and the solution he presents is nonentity more than advertising more? It seems that if he feels so strongly about the is sue at the hand, I would think there would be a more ! complex solution to figure such an complex problem. Overall, I feel the message David Majka was trying to get crosswise was a good one. It is apparent that there is an issue regarding how people go about research; however, I feel that he went about it at a all told obscene angle. He was much to general about his comments towards, and about, librarians; his solution seemed to be too simple for such a problem, and the tone used throughout most of the article was absurd. Although his intentions were to show the problem at hand, I would have found this article to be rude and degrading. I do not have the citing for the paper, it wasnt take. If bibliography is needed - Conqueror Bookworm by David Majka. American Libraries. June/July 2001. Pages 61-63. If you want to get a good essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper