.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Neuropsychology & Spouse/Family Members :: Chemistry Chemical Neuropsychological Papers

I set apart to explore the effects of a parietal thought blur from the scene of a neuropsychologist ranging from types of tests that are employed when trying to settle down the extent of the damage, to meeting an ground of how this damage will affect the rest of the brain and/or the body. I will also explore the effects of a brain injury from the perspective of the family members, and their experiences with the changes that occur during the rehabilitation process. According to The Neuropsychology Center, neuropsychological judging is a systematic clinical diagnostic procedure used to determine the extent of any possible behavioral deficits following diagnosed or suspect brain injury(www.neuropsych.com). As mentioned previously, a brain injury potentiometer be the result of many types of injuries or disorders, thus a diligent of range of judgment procedures have been developed to encompass these possibilities. Two types of assessment procedures that are currently b eing used are the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological assault and battery (LNNB), and the Halstead Russell Neuropsychological Evaluation System (HRNES-R). The LNNB is used to diagnose cognitive deficits, patch the HRNES-R indicates both the presence and degree of impairment. Both procedures involve tasks that require the patient to complete a series of functions that test abilities and/or perceptions. Such tasks would include, hardly are not limited to, problem solving, memory, sensorimotor functioning, and psychological/ emotional status. Other testing procedures that are commonly employed, in order to gain a better visual image of the excitatory activity in the brain are the PET scan and the MRI. According to Kalat (2004), these methods are non-invasive, heart that they dont require the insertion of objects into the brain, yet they yield results that capture researchers to record brain activity. The PET scan (positron emission tomography) involves the researcher inj ecting a hot chemical into the patients body, which is then absorbed in general by the brains most active cells. With the use of radioactive detectors, placed around the patients head, a map is produced that shows which areas of the brain are most active. The MRI, on the other hand is less dearly-won and much safer (as it doesnt expose the patient to potentially harmful radioactive chemicals). The MRI or magnetic resonance imaging device, as an safer alternative, applies a powerful magnetic field around the head of the patient.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.