class size Essay -- essays research papers

In 1998, President Clinton sparked a debate when he proposed the first national effort to reduce single out surface in the early grades. People who supported this proposal argued that the resolving power of smaller classes (especially in the younger grades) would be much effective statement and learning and higher student achievement. Critics say reducing class sizing is costly and that decreasing class size of it does not mean that teacher effectiveness will improve, and other less expensive alternatives could be employ that might achieve the same educational goals. Today, this debate continues. To say every district should reduce class sizes is wrong. Each district is antithetic and has different needs, but one goal all districts share is to maximize teach and learning in their schools. If a district believes reducing class size is the best way to achieve this goal, and they have the money, the facilities, and the teachers, reducing class size should be done, but if a dis trict believes the money that would be spend on reducing class size could be better worn-out(a) on alternatives to achieve this goal, reducing class size should not be done. Critics mainly oppose reducing class size because of the shortage of buildings and attribute teachers and the conflicting research that has been done. Decreasing class size means more classrooms need to be built, and more teachers need to be hired. In both(prenominal) districts, this could be a problem because they have a problem hiring fictional character teachers as it is, and they might...