Case: Erik Peterson Essay

Do you count on Erik Peterson was an effective drawing card? Why or why non? I do think Erik Peterson was an effective leader. Erik Peterson was definitely represented skillful leadership from both case of his work. Though at the very beginning, there were a great umpteen problems exsiting in the GMCT and had negative effective on operating, Erik Peterson was trying his best to put to work these problems and to some extend, gain some outcomes which revealed Erik Peterson was an effective leader. First Erik Peterson found the head teacher engineer, Curt Andrews, had a plenty of problems.Erik Peterson noticed that Curt Andrews was lack of presidency skills which were required to start up new operation. Erik Peterson made every ride to solve Curts problem, such as replaced Curt by someone more capacitive in this position. Eventually, to help Curt alter the planning and coordination, Erik Peterson held one-on-one counseling sessions to show Curt how to plan better.Erik Peterso n showed good leadership for the reason that Erik Petersons work-facilitation behavior indicated that Erik Peterson was willing to provide mentoring, coaching and counseling to assist employees in developing their skills. Also, Erik Peiterson believed high moral and sense impression would encourage people to work as a team and participate more in organization, thus, he held meeting every week in order to let employee to communication and replace of ideas. Under the Leader- Member exchange Model of Leadership, it was the so called in group exchange. Most employees tell the meeting was effective, they found from the meeting, they developed respect, mutual trust and a sense of common partnership.This kind of leadership was effective, employees tended to increase job satisfaction and seduce more trust for company and coworkers. From the part key personnel assignments we could purpose that Erik Peterson was kind of transactional leadership. He clarified employees role, such as he found that Trevor Burns was very bright, knowledgeable and sophisticated and assign him in the management group of GMCT. He found the out what peoples the capacity and strength was and assigned them to the right position.This definitely increased talent of the daily work. Meanwhile, Erik Peterson gave positive rewards -promotion for his secretary based on her good motion on work. As to the salary problem of Trevor Burns, Erik Peterson showed the empathy which was an essential part of ruttish intelligence according to the article what makes a leader. Erik Peterson felt uneasy when he was hearing Trevors salary was 25% less because he believed Trevor deserved it. Then Erik Peterson had a conversation with Trevor concerning the decrease and Trevor, finally received the cut of 20%. Erik Peterson was thoughtfully and considering employees feeling-along with other factors in the mathematical operation of making intelligent decisions. After noticing the initial construction of cellul ar the not that GMCTs relationship with four of the towns in the license area, Erik Peterson made every effort to solve these problems.At the same time, Erik Peterson revealed self-aware during his work, which was another grand part of emotional intelligence. Erik Peterson recognized the problems about the local utility in getting it to make ready its telephone lines according to the promised schedule. Whats more, Erik Peterson completed the bad relationship between Curt and Trevor. Feeling unable to aim with these problems, Erik Peterson was looking forward to talk with buck who w the executive to rule out the solution to the problems.. Erik Peterson knew when to ask for help.Also, he had a firm pick up of himself and he would not let him overstretching the assignment. Knight arranged a cardinal day meeting with Erik Peterson, discussing the problems Erik Peterson were facing in his organization. This process may utter in the article tipping point leadership as breaking t hrough with(predicate) the cognitive hurdle. From the meeting, Erik Peterson provided Knight, the executive with the opportunity to had a face-to-face with the problems. In this case, Erik Peterson may be more likely to get help from Knight since Knight might get a profoudining understanding of how serious the problems were and gave Erik Peterson support to vote out these problems in the organization.