Evaluating Historical Views of Leadership Essay

The process of evaluating diachronic aspects of attractorship involved critic eithery analyzing the commonalities and disparities among a group of influential leading, such as Thomas Carlyle, Mohandas Gandhi, Niccolo Machiavelli and W.E.B Du Bois. Carlyle (1795-1881), a Scottish historian emphasized the vastness of heroism that call for men to be subordinated to the commander of men (Wren, 1995 p.53). further analysis of the evaluation revealed theories of Gandhi and Machiavelli which produced evidence of conflicting viewpoints on the topic of force play among historical drawing cards throughout the ages. Gandhis leaders style was against every acts of violence. He foc physical exercised on using spiritual guidance to go problems. Machiavellis leaders style believed in having mercy but also defending yourself if necessary. W.E.B Du Boiss leadership style cerebrate on educating calamitous men to be great leaders.Each leaders theories on the quality of acceptable leadership were different, yet acceptable in their communities, however, sever altogethery leader presented various methods of effective leadership abilities, which will influence early(a) leaders as they develop their theories.Commonalities and DisparitiesThomas Carlyle, believed that the commander of men was superior, and all men were to be subordinated. Carlyle focused on the theory that leaders who exhibited themselves in a dignified manner embodied the qualities of a great leader (Carlyle, 1795-1881 Wren, 1995, p.53). Carlyle also emphasized that heroism existed in whoever embodied the spiritual qualities of a commander. just examination of Carlyles leadership theory revealed that he believed that a leader who is a nobleman quite a little be trusted by all passel (Carlyle, 1795-1881 Wren, 1995, p.53). Niccolo Machiavellis theory of a leader was expound as person who house lead men whether they abided by or disobey the law.Machiavelli also believed that leaders who can try out aut hority can be merciful, humane, but cautious. Mohandas Gandhi theory believed leaders should operate using self- influence and discipline. Gandhi also described a powerful leader as some integrity who uses passive resistance (Gandhi, 1869-1984 Machiavelli, 1469-1527 Wren, 1995, p.68 &75). Finally W.E.B Du Bois was an advocate for educating black men, and he determined great emphasize on how education involved the training of ones mind, body and surroundings (Du Bois, 1868-1963 Wren, 1995, p.78). Du Bois theory on learning is that people can be influenced by their surrounds and motivated by different groups of people. vituperative AnalysisAfter completing the commonalities and disparities involving three great leaders my exact evaluation has led me to the conclusion that even though these leaders live the characteristic to be excellent facilitators and commanders, each leader lacks the mightiness to use effective communicating skills. Previous research has suggested that the lac k of communication can be confusing, misunderstanding and lethal. For example, Emperor Frederick 13th century ruler of the set apart Roman Empire conducted research to determine what language mankind had verbalise at birth. The experiment involved isolating infants from hearing any communication until they spoke their first words. However, as a result of the experiment the babies died (Samata, 2012).Further studies give concluded that leaders who implement communication skills can establish their existence and define their image, but leaders who fail to communicate in effect and positively, risk damaging their reputation (Samata, 2012). Effective leadership requires leaders to be competent communicators, which is achieved by using clear and concise communication (Adubato, 2010). Furthermore, leaders who can use communication skills effectively, are able to comprehend and pull up ideas (Ringer, 2002 Tareq, 2008).Achieving effective oral communication skills requires leaders to li mit words and phrases, which results in explaining their concepts and ideas. Levinson also states, leaders who use too many words have a tendency to ramble about non-relevant issues, however summarizing the chief(prenominal) points, staying focused and avoiding distr treats helps leaders discipline what information is relevant, resulting intranslating their thoughts into a profitable action faster (1968). Effective communication requires leaders to be prepared, organized and observant, gift leaders the ability to execute their message successfully (Showry & Manasa, 2012).Conclusion.By evaluating the leadership styles of historical leaders, I was able to understand how their theories influenced people throughout the ages. Carlyle, Gandhi, Machiavelli, and DuBois were all very influential leaders during their times in history. However, after study their similarities and disparities in theory and style, it is apparent that Carlyle viewpoints on what a great leader should be is entir ely different from the perspectives of Gandhi, Machiavelli, and DuBois. Carlyle emphasized that all men should universe entirely subordinate to their commander, and Gandhi believed in spirituality and taught leaders to focus on positive concepts.Machiavelli used a more drastic approach that required him to be prudent, be observant and maintain authority. Du Bois believed that black men should be educated. Further observation revealed that, even though, each leader embodied leadership qualities, using effective communication skills are essential to providing leaders with founder communication technique, making the message clear and concise. attractors have the ability to achieve effective communication skills by limiting their words and stating the main facts. Finally leaders who can improve communication skills, can gift people, and maintain stability.ReferenceAdubato, S. (2010). Communication is key to effective office squad building. NJBIZ, 23(27), 9. Retrieved from http//sea rch.proquest.com/docview/644992473?accountid=35812 Levinson, R. E. (1968). How to get through to people. Industrial Management, 10(5), 11.Ringer, R. (2002, Jul 28). Communication skills valued by employers. Pantagraph Retrieved from http//search.proquest.com/docview/252480712?accountid=35812 Tareq, N. A. (2008, pervert 06). Affective communication skills. Yemen Times Retrieved fromhttp//search.proquest.com/docview/429795478?accountid=35812 Samata, P. (2012). Importance of Effective Communication Skills. delivery In India, 12(10), 333-341. Showry, M., & Manasa, K. (2012). Effective Communication for Professional Excellence. IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 6(1), 39-46.Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders retainer Insight on leadership through the ages. Carlyle, T. The wizard as King (pp.53-54) invigorated York, NY The Free Press.Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders retainer Insight on leadership through the ages. Du Bois, W .E.B. The Talented one-tenth (pp.78-80) New York, NY The Free Press. Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders Companion Insight on leadership through the ages. Gandhi, M. Satyagraha (pp.72-77) New York, NY The Free Press.Wren, J. T. (1995). The Leaders Companion Insight on leadership through the ages. Machiavelli, N. How Princes Should Keep Faith (pp.67-68) New York, NY The Free Press.